Immunological basis that supports the treatment of Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C/PIMS)

Pediatric inflammatory multisystemic syndrome temporarily associated with COVID-19 (MIS-C/PIMS) is a new post-infectious condition, secondary to SARS-CoV2 infection. It has been characterized by an inflammatory response with multisystem involvement, involving several mechanisms of immune damage such as an exaggerated increase in cytokines and epithelial damage. Immunomodulatory treatment is aimed at controlling the manifestations of hyperinflammation, to stabilize and prevent long-term sequelae. © 2023 Instituto Nacional de Pediatria. All rights reserved.

Clinical experience of Raphamin therapy in outpatients after hospital treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia

Post-infectious immunosuppression may cause repeated hospitalization after COVID-19 pneumonia. The results of the observational study of the Raphamin use for immunotherapy in the recovery period of COVID-19 pneumonia are presented. Aim(s): to estimate efficiency of Rafamin usage in patients who have completed the course of inpatient treatment for coronavirus pneumonia. Material and methods. Thirty patients aged 18 to 80 years after hospital treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia were included and randomized into 2 groups (1: 1). All patients received anticoagulants, antioxidants, metabolic drugs. Patients of the 1st group (n=15) were additionally prescribed Raphamin for 5 days. The primary endpoint was the number of repeated hospitalizations due to consequences of COVID-19 and/or new cases of acute respiratory infection for 28 days of follow-up. In addition, dynamic of immune and inflammatory markers (absolute lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein), proportion of patients with immune dysregulation, and duration of symptoms associated with COVID-19 were assessed. Results. The number of hospitalized patients in group 1 was 0 (vs 5 in group 2, p=0.0421). Study therapy reduced the risk of repeated hospitalizations in 1.44 times [relative risk 1.44;95% confidence interval 0.91-2.28];duration of breathlessness decreased from 24.5 to 15.3 days (p=0.0108), and duration of fatigue reduced from 23.6 to 16.8 days (p=0.0452). The proportion of patients with immune markers normalization was 2 times higher than in the comparison group on 14 day of observation. Conclusion. The immunomodulatory therapy may be recommended during the recovery period of COVID-19 pneumonia.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2022.

The accelerated waning of immunity and reduced effect of booster in patients treated with bDMARD and tsDMARD after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the duration of humoral responses after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with inflammatory joint diseases and IBD and booster vaccination compared with healthy controls. It also aimed to analyze factors influencing the quantity and quality of the immune response. Methods: We enrolled 41 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 35 with seronegative spondyloarthritis (SpA), and 41 suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), excluding those receiving B-cell-depleting therapies. We assessed total anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (Abs) and neutralizing Ab titers 6 months after two and then after three doses of mRNA vaccines compared with healthy controls. We analyzed the influence of therapies on the humoral response. Results: Patients receiving biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) showed reduced anti-SARS-CoV-2 S Abs and neutralizing Ab titers compared with HC or patients receiving conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs 6 months after the first two vaccination doses. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers of patients with b/tsDMARDs declined more rapidly, leading to a significant reduction in the duration of vaccination-induced immunity after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. While 23% of HC and 19% of patients receiving csDMARDs were without detectable neutralizing Abs 6 months after the first two vaccination doses, this number was 62% in patients receiving b/tsDMARDs and 52% in patients receiving a combination of csDMARDs and b/tsDMARDs. Booster vaccination led to increased anti-SARS-CoV-2 S Abs in all HC and patients. However, anti-SARS-CoV-2 S Abs after booster vaccination was diminished in patients receiving b/tsDMARDs, either alone or in combination with csDMARDs compared to HC. Conclusion: Patients receiving b/tsDMARDs have significantly reduced Abs and neutralizing Ab titers 6 months after mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. This was due to a faster decline in Ab levels, indicating a significantly reduced duration of vaccination-induced immunity compared with HC or patients receiving csDMARDs. In addition, they display a reduced response to a booster vaccination, warranting earlier booster vaccination strategies in patients under b/tsDMARD therapy, according to their specific Ab levels.

Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine among Adolescents with Juvenile-onset Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for adolescents with juvenile-onset inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) is unknown. Several studies suggested attenuated immunogenicity in patients with IRD. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in preventing COVID-19 infection in adolescents with juvenile-onset IRD compared with controls without immune rheumatic disease. METHODS: We used data from Clalit Health Services, the largest healthcare organization in Israel, to conduct an observational cohort study from February to December 2021, involving adolescents 12-18 years-old, diagnosed with IRD. Study outcomes included documented COVID-19 infection in relation to vaccination status and immunomodulatory therapy. We estimated vaccine effectiveness as one minus the risk ratio. Adolescents without immune rheumatic disease, 12-18 years-old, served as controls. RESULTS: A total of 1,639 adolescents with IRD (juvenile idiopathic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or familial Mediterranean fever) were included and compared with 524 471 adolescents in the same age range. There was no difference in COVID-19 infection rates after the second dose of vaccine for those with IRD and controls (2.1% vs 2.1% respectively, p= 0.99). The estimated vaccine effectiveness for adolescents with IRD was 76.3% after the first dose, 94.8% after the second and 99.2% after the third dose. CONCLUSION: We found that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine is effective against COVID-19 infection in adolescents with IRD, similar to controls without immune rheumatic disease. Immunomodulatory therapy did not affect its effectiveness. These results can encourage adolescents with IRD to get vaccinated against COVID-19.

Clinical experience of Raphamin therapy in outpatients after hospital treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia

Post-infectious immunosuppression may cause repeated hospitalization after COVID-19 pneumonia. The results of the observational study of the Raphamin use for immunotherapy in the recovery period of COVID-19 pneumonia are presented. Aim: to estimate efficiency of Rafamin usage in patients who have completed the course of inpatient treatment for coronavirus pneumonia. Material and methods. Thirty patients aged 18 to 80 years after hospital treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia were included and randomized into 2 groups (1: 1). All patients received anticoagulants, antioxidants, metabolic drugs. Patients of the 1st group (n=15) were additionally prescribed Raphamin for 5 days. The primary endpoint was the number of repeated hospitalizations due to consequences of COVID-19 and/or new cases of acute respiratory infection for 28 days of follow-up. In addition, dynamic of immune and inflammatory markers (absolute lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein), proportion of patients with immune dysregulation, and duration of symptoms associated with COVID-19 were assessed. Results. The number of hospitalized patients in group 1 was 0 (vs 5 in group 2, p=0.0421). Study therapy reduced the risk of repeated hospitalizations in 1.44 times [relative risk 1.44;95% confidence interval 0.91–2.28];duration of breathlessness decreased from 24.5 to 15.3 days (p=0.0108), and duration of fatigue reduced from 23.6 to 16.8 days (p=0.0452). The proportion of patients with immune markers normalization was 2 times higher than in the comparison group on 14 day of observation. Conclusion. The immunomodulatory therapy may be recommended during the recovery period of COVID-19 pneumonia. © Eco-Vector, 2022.

Long-term cognitive performance and its relation to anti-inflammatory therapy in a cohort of survivors of severe COVID-19.

Background and objectives: Long-term cognitive performance data in former critically ill COVID-19 patients are sparse. Current evidence suggests that cognitive decline is related to neuroinflammation, which might be attenuated by COVID-19 related anti-inflammatory therapies. The objective of this prospective cohort study was to study long term cognitive outcomes following severe COVID-19 and the relation to anti-inflammatory therapies. Methods: Prospective observational cohort of patients that survived an intensive care unit (ICU) admission due to severe COVID-19. Six months after hospital discharge, we extensively assessed both objective cognitive functioning and subjective cognitive complaints. Furthermore, patients were stratified in cohorts according to their anti-inflammatory treatment (i.e. no immunomodulatory therapy, dexamethasone, or both dexamethasone and interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab). Results: 96 patients were included (March 2020-June 2021, median [IQR] age 61 [55-69] years). 91% received invasive mechanical ventilation, and mean ± SD severity-of-disease APACHE-II-score at admission was 15.8 ± 4.1. After 6.5 ± 1.3 months, 27% of patients scored cognitively impaired. Patients that did or did not develop cognitive impairments were similar in ICU-admission parameters, clinical course and delirium incidence. Patients with subjective cognitive complaints (20%) were more likely women (61% vs 26%), and had a shorter ICU stay (median [IQR] 8 [5-15] vs 18 [9-31], p = 0.002). Objective cognitive dysfunction did not correlate with subjective cognitive dysfunction. 27% of the participants received dexamethasone during intensive care admission, 44% received additional tocilizumab and 29% received neither. Overall occurrence and severity of cognitive dysfunction were not affected by anti-inflammatory therapy, although patients treated with both dexamethasone and tocilizumab had worse executive functioning scores (Trail Making Test interference) than patients without anti-inflammatory treatment (T-score 40.3 ± 13.5 vs 49.1 ± 9.3, p = 0.007). Discussion: A relevant proportion of critically ill COVID-19 patients shows deficits in long-term cognitive functioning. Apart from more pronounced executive dysfunction, overall, anti-inflammatory therapy appeared not to affect long-term cognitive performance. Our findings provide insight in long-term cognitive outcomes in patients who survived COVID-19, that may facilitate health-care providers counseling patients and their caregivers.

Case Report: COVID-19 Vaccination Associated Fulminant Myocarditis.

Herein, we describe a novel finding of fulminant myocarditis (FM) in two subjects the day after administration of the first dose of the currently available inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cell). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed extensive myocardial edema and necrosis. A pathologic evaluation of the endocardial biopsy tissues revealed inflammatory cell (lymphocytes) infiltration and interstitial edema, myocyte necrosis, and focal areas of fibrosis. A life-support-based comprehensive treatment regimen comprising mechanical circulatory support using intra-aortic balloon pulsation and immunomodulatory therapy-glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin-was used to treat the patients with FM; eventually, the patients recovered and were discharged. To our knowledge, these are the first two reported cases of FM, with no other identified cause or associated illness, after receiving the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cell). These findings suggest a novel pathogenesis of myocarditis which mentions to pay more attention to this rare, but lethal complication of COVID-19 vaccination.

The Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Neurological disability associated with multiple sclerosis and immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy which is administered for it may increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its morbidity/mortality. In this study, we evaluated the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with multiple sclerosis based on their demographic and disease data. Methods: A total of 1361 multiple sclerosis patients from Fars province were interviewed by phone from April 3 to June 20, 2020. Basic demographic data, information about their disease and any symptoms or laboratory results relevant to COVID-19 were gathered. Results: Among the studied patients, 68 ones (5%) were COVID-19 suspected cases and 8 ones (0.58%) were in the confirmed group. Five cases in the confirmed group needed hospitalization. Two patients died while both of them were taking rituximab. The frequency rate of suspected cases with RRMS was 57 (87.7%), followed by 5 (7.7%) PPMS and 2 (3.1%) CIS. In the confirmed group, 25% used corticosteroid drug and 50% were on rituximab;moreover, 62.5% of the confirmed cases had a high disability level and needed assistance to walk. In whole, 36.8% of the suspected and 25% of the confirmed cases were on IFN-β1;eventually, all of them recovered well from COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: In the present study, the rate of developing COVID-19 in multiple sclerosis patients was similar to the general population and most of patients with multiple sclerosis recovered from COVID-19 without referral to a medical specialist. © 2021, Kerman University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Who Received Compassionate-Use Leronlimab.

BACKGROUND: Leronlimab, a monoclonal antibody blocker of C-C chemokine receptor type 5 originally developed to treat human immunodeficiency virus infection, was administered as an open-label compassionate-use therapeutic for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Twenty-three hospitalized severe/critical COVID-19 patients received 700 mg leronlimab subcutaneously, repeated after 7 days in 17 of 23 patients still hospitalized. Eighteen of 23 received other experimental treatments, including convalescent plasma, hydroxychloroquine, steroids, and/or tocilizumab. Five of 23 received leronlimab after blinded, placebo-controlled trials of remdesivir, sarilumab, selinexor, or tocilizumab. Outcomes and results were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: Mean age was 69.5 ±â€…14.9 years; 20 had significant comorbidities. At baseline, 22 were receiving supplemental oxygen (3 high flow, 7 mechanical ventilation). Blood showed markedly elevated inflammatory markers (ferritin, D-dimer, C-reactive protein) and an elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. By day 30 after initial dosing, 17 were recovered, 2 were still hospitalized, and 4 had died. Of the 7 intubated at baseline, 4 were fully recovered off oxygen, 2 were still hospitalized, and 1 had died. CONCLUSIONS: Leronlimab appeared safe and well tolerated. The high recovery rate suggested benefit, and those with lower inflammatory markers had better outcomes. Some, but not all, patients appeared to have dramatic clinical responses, indicating that unknown factors may determine responsiveness to leronlimab. Routine inflammatory and cell prognostic markers did not markedly change immediately after treatment, although interleukin-6 tended to fall. In some persons, C-reactive protein clearly dropped only after the second leronlimab dose, suggesting that a higher loading dose might be more effective. Future controlled trials will be informative.

COVID-19 and the Use of Immunomodulatory Agents in Ophthalmology

Immunomodulatory agents are often used in the systemic treatment of non-infectious uveitis. These drugs consist of corticosteroids, conventional immunosuppressives, and biological agents. As it is known that they suppress the immune system, the most important concern associated with immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) is the increased risk of infection. The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020. Although severe acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection may develop in all people, patients who receive IMT may be at higher risk in terms of both the transmission of the infection and more severe disease course. Therefore, guidelines on the management of patients receiving IMT due to uveitis during the pandemic are needed. In this review, we examined the immunomodulatory drugs used in the treatment of uveitis in terms of infectious complications and the data of patients who received IMT during the COVID-19 pandemic and discussed recommendations for the use of these drugs. According to the latest information, patients who receive IMT may continue their treatment as long as there are no disruptions in regular complete blood count (especially white blood cell count >4,000/µL) and liver and kidney function tests. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 should be managed with a multidisciplinary approach.

Whole lung irradiation as a novel treatment for COVID-19: Interim results of an ongoing phase 2 trial in India.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The main cause of death in COVID-19 pneumonia is acute respiratory distress syndrome which is preceded by massive cytokine release. Low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects that can interfere with the inflammatory cascade, reducing the severity of associated cytokine release. MATERIAL & METHODS: 25 patients with RT-PCR proven COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled between November 2020 and May 2021. All patients had SpO2 < 94 % on room air, respiratory frequency > 24/min and SpO2/FiO2 ratio (SF ratio) of >89 but <357. Patients were treated according to standard COVID-19 management guidelines along with single fraction LDRT of 0.5 Gy to bilateral whole lungs within 10 days of symptom onset and 5 days of hospital admission. RESULTS: LDRT was well tolerated by all patients. There was a statistically significant improvement in oxygenation as given by the SF ratio between pre-RT and day 2 (p < 0.05), day 3 (p < 0.001) and day 7 (p < 0.001) post RT. Demand for supplemental oxygen showed statistically significant reduction between pre-RT and day 2 (p < 0.05), day 3 (p < 0.001), day 7 (p < 0.001) post RT. 88 % patients attained clinical recovery within 10 days post LDRT and median time to hospital discharge from day of LDRT was 6 days. Three patients deteriorated and died. CONCLUSION: As per our initial experience, LDRT appears to be a promising modality of treatment with rapid relief of respiratory distress in selected patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. This translates to early clinical recovery and hospital discharge in the selected patient group.

Immunomodulatory therapy, risk factors and outcomes of hospital-acquired bloodstream infection in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a Spanish case-control matched multicentre study (BACTCOVID).

OBJECTIVES: The effect of the use of immunomodulatory drugs on the risk of developing hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with COVID-19 has not been specifically assessed. We aim to identify risk factors for, and outcomes of, BSI among hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: We performed a severity matched case-control study (1:1 ratio) nested in a large multicentre prospective cohort of hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Cases with BSI were identified from the cohort database. Controls were matched for age, sex and acute respiratory distress syndrome. A Cox proportional hazard ratio model was performed. RESULTS: Of 2005 patients, 100 (4.98%) presented 142 episodes of BSI, mainly caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Polymicrobial infection accounted for 23 episodes. The median time from admission to the first episode of BSI was 15 days (IQR 9-20), and the most frequent source was catheter-related infection. The characteristics of patients with and without BSI were similar, including the use of tocilizumab, corticosteroids, and combinations. In the multivariate analysis, the use of these immunomodulatory drugs was not associated with an increased risk of BSI. A Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) model showed that after adjusting for the time factor, BSI was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality risk (HR 2.59; 1.65-4.07; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Hospital-acquired BSI in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia was uncommon and the use of immunomodulatory drugs was not associated with its development. When adjusting for the time factor, BSI was associated with a higher mortality risk.

COVID-19 and Immunosuppressive Therapy in Ocular Inflammatory Disease, a Telemedicine Survey.

Purpose: Determine the risk of immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) for COVID-19 infection morbidity.Method: A telemedicine survey on patients of a referral uveitis clinic was performed. Signs of infection, habits, and hospitalizations during the 7 months of the COVID-19 pandemic prior to the study date were recorded. Suggestive findings in chest CT scan and/or positive RT-PCR were considered as confirmed COVID-19 infection while those with only suggestive symptoms were considered as suspected cases. Risk factors including sanitary measures and IMT were compared between patients with confirmed cases and patients without infection.Result: 694 patients were included. Eight patients were identified as confirmed cases and 22 patients as suspected cases of COVID-19 infection. Close contact with infected persons was the only significant risk factor for contracting COVID-19.Conclusion: Using IMT did not affect hospitalization and/or ICU admission and can thus be continued during the pandemic, provided that instructions for preventive measures are followed.

COVID-19 prevalence and outcomes in patients receiving biologic therapies at an infusion center in New York City.

To better understand COVID-19 infection in patients receiving biologic and immunomodulatory therapies, we evaluated prevalence and outcomes for symptomatic cases of COVID-19 at a large therapeutic infusion center in New York City during the height of the pandemic. 2074 patients received treatment with biologic infusions at our center between March and May 2020, and 34 patients developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection, for an overall low rate of 1.64%. The majority of infections and deaths were in a small subset of patients with a primary immunodeficiency. Patients with inflammatory or autoimmune conditions requiring biologic therapies tended to have mild cases. Higher inflammatory responses were observed in patients who died.

Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of immunomodulatory therapy with tocilizumab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in real-life clinical practice remains controversial. METHODS: Single-center retrospective matched cohort analysis including 47 consecutive patients treated with intravenous tocilizumab for severe COVID-19 pneumonia ("TCZ group"), matched by age, comorbidities, time from symptoms onset and baseline SpO2/FiO2 ratio with 47 patients receiving standard of care alone ("SoC group"). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the TCZ and SoC groups in the rate of clinical improvement (hospital discharge and/or a decrease of ≥2 points on a six-point ordinal scale) by day 7 (51.1% [24/47] versus 48.9% [23/47]; P-value=1.000). No differences were observed at day 14 in terms of clinical improvement (72.3% versus 76.6%; P-value=0.791), all-cause mortality (10.6% versus 12.8%; P-value=1.000), and the composite of invasive mechanical ventilation and/or death (25.5% versus 23.4%; P-value=1.000) either. Patients in the TCZ group had a more rapid normalization of C-reactive protein levels. CONCLUSIONS: No apparent benefit was observed in patients with severe COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab as compared to a matched retrospective cohort.

Tocilizumab for the treatment of non-critical COVID-19 pneumonia: an overview of the rationale and clinical evidence to date.

Introduction: Tocilizumab is one of the main repurposed therapies investigated for COVID-19 pneumonia since the start of the pandemic, but there has been conflicting evidence for its use.Areas covered: This review covers the physiology of interleukin-6 and its role in the pathophysiology of COVID-19. We discuss the use of tocilizumab in other diseases and the rationale for its use in COVID-19. We summarize the design, contrasting results, and implications of the clinical trials of tocilizumab in COVID-19 to date and discuss the current guidance for its use.Expert opinion: The evidence to date suggests benefit with the use of tocilizumab in some but not all patients with COVID-19. Benefit seems to be greatest when given early after clinical deterioration with the presence of systemic inflammation. However, questions remain around the optimal timing, patient selection, and concomitant treatments.

Multidisciplinary Guidance Regarding the Use of Immunomodulatory Therapies for Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated lung injury and systemic hyperinflammation are characteristic of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults. Although the majority of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections in pediatric populations result in minimal or mild COVID-19 in the acute phase of infection, a small subset of children develop severe and even critical disease in this phase with concomitant inflammation that may benefit from immunomodulation. Therefore, guidance is needed regarding immunomodulatory therapies in the setting of acute pediatric COVID-19. This document does not provide guidance regarding the recently emergent multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of pediatric subspecialty physicians and pharmacists with expertise in infectious diseases, rheumatology, hematology/oncology, and critical care medicine was convened. Guidance statements were developed based on best available evidence and expert opinion. RESULTS: The panel devised a framework for considering the use of immunomodulatory therapy based on an assessment of clinical disease severity and degree of multiorgan involvement combined with evidence of hyperinflammation. Additionally, the known rationale for consideration of each immunomodulatory approach and the associated risks and benefits was summarized. CONCLUSIONS: Immunomodulatory therapy is not recommended for the majority of pediatric patients, who typically develop mild or moderate COVID-19. For children with severe or critical illness, the use of immunomodulatory agents may be beneficial. The risks and benefits of such therapies are variable and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with input from appropriate specialty services. When available, the panel strongly favors immunomodulatory agent use within the context of clinical trials. The framework presented herein offers an approach to decision-making regarding immunomodulatory therapy for severe or critical pediatric COVID-19 and is informed by currently available data, while awaiting results of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials.

An evidence-based guide to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of patients on immunotherapies in dermatology.

Immune-mediated diseases and immunotherapeutics can negatively affect normal immune functioning and, consequently, vaccine safety and response. The COVID-19 pandemic has incited research aimed at developing a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. As SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are developed and made available, the assessment of anticipated safety and efficacy in patients with immune-mediated dermatologic diseases and requiring immunosuppressive and/or immunomodulatory therapy is particularly important. A review of the literature was conducted by a multidisciplinary committee to provide guidance on the safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for dermatologists and other clinicians when prescribing immunotherapeutics. The vaccine platforms being used to develop SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are expected to be safe and potentially effective for dermatology patients on immunotherapeutics. Current guidelines for the vaccination of an immunocompromised host remain appropriate when considering future administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.